07/08/2025 / By Willow Tohi
The Wisconsin’s Supreme Court has delivered a seismic blow to pro-life advocates by overturning the state’s 1849 abortion ban—a law temporarily reactivated after the U.S. Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. Jackson decision ended Roe v. Wade in 2022. The 4-3 ruling, penned by Justice Rebecca Dallet and backed by the court’s liberal majority, declared that modern abortion regulations enacted over the past 50 years had effectively replaced the near-total prohibition from the 19th century.
The decision—celebrated by Democratic officials and abortion-rights groups—immediately drew scathing dissent from conservative justices, who accused their colleagues of legislating from the bench. Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul, who spearheaded the legal challenge, called the outcome “a major victory for reproductive freedom,” while pro-life organizations labeled it a dangerous overreach.
The 1849 statute, which criminalized abortion except to save the mother’s life, lay dormant for decades under Roe. When the federal guarantee fell in 2022, Republican lawmakers and pro-life advocates argued the antiquated ban should govern again.
Yet Dane County Judge Diane Schlipper ruled in 2023 that the law only applied to non-consensual “feticide,” not physician-performed abortions. That interpretation allowed clinics like Planned Parenthood to resume services—but left lingering uncertainty until this week’s Supreme Court cementing of that stance.
Justice Dallet’s majority opinion emphasized that post-Roe laws—including a 1985 statute permitting abortions up to fetal viability—created a “comprehensive” legal framework displacing the 1849 ban.
The ruling’s dissenters spared no criticism. Justice Annette Ziegler blasted the majority for “inventing legal theories” to satisfy political agendas.
“Four members of the court make up and apply their own version of implied repeal, failing to hew to any semblance of traditional judicial decision-making,” Ziegler wrote. Justice Rebecca Bradley went further, accusing liberals of behaving as “super legislators” in service of “personal preference.”
Pro-life leaders echoed the outrage. Heather Weininger of Wisconsin Right to Life called the decision “deeply disappointing,” adding, “To assert that a repeal is implied is to legislate from the bench.”
The ruling ensures abortion remains a central issue in Wisconsin’s 2026 Supreme Court race, where conservative Justice Rebecca Bradley will defend her seat against Democrat Chris Taylor, a former Planned Parenthood executive. Taylor’s campaign swiftly fundraised off the decision, framing it as a triumph for “basic freedoms.”
Governor Tony Evers (D) vowed to defend abortion access but acknowledged the fight isn’t over: “Our work is not done. I will continue to fight any effort that takes away Wisconsinites’ reproductive freedom.”
For now, abortions remain legal under statewide viability standards—but pro-life advocates signaled plans for legislative or ballot measures to counter the court’s action.
Wisconsin’s clash over its 1849 ban mirrors the national reckoning post-Dobbs, where state courts and legislatures grapple with the legal void left by Roe’s demise. Wednesday’s ruling entrenches abortion rights in a key battleground state—but the razor-thin 4-3 margin underscores how judicial elections can reshape policy overnight.
As both sides regroup for the next phase of the battle, one reality is clear: Wisconsin’s abortion debate, far from settled, has entered a new era of contentious legal and political warfare.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
abortion, bias, conservatives, depopulation, feticide, intolerance, left cult, liberals, politics, population control, Wisconsin
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2017 ABORTIONS.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. Abortions.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Abortions.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.